Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login

Why the Yanks are so worried about the bail out

September 29th 2008 23:31
Do the maths

700 Billion Dollars divided by the population of the USA of 300 Million

That is: 700,000,000,000
divided by: 300,000,000

The answer is : 2333.333

That means every man woman and child has to folk up $2,333.33 to keep the economy afloat.


I would be pissed too.

No wonder they got nervous in passing the bill.



101
Vote
Add To: del.icio.us Digg Furl Spurl.net StumbleUpon Yahoo


   
Subscribe to this blog 


Just this blog This blog and DailyOrble (recommended)

   

   


Comments
12 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by S.L.

September 29th 2008 23:50
That's not even the worst of it, Damo. We're expected to pay all that money to bail out the people who caused the problem! Talk about rewarding incompetence!!

Comment by Damo

September 30th 2008 01:23
SLB

It happens all the time.
If company is big enough it can drag others down with it.

Comment by KylieW

September 30th 2008 05:07
When you put it like that...............

Comment by Damo

September 30th 2008 05:22
KylieW

What are you going to do?

I am waiting for the US dollar to drop before I purchase anything from ebay.

Comment by Cibbuano

September 30th 2008 22:08
Damo, that's some good thinking. Shit! I just bought some comic books on Amazon!

The idea makes me sick to my stomach - the govt pulled back regulations to let the bankers make more money. Fine - then accept the risk. If the banks have the power to pull down the entire economy, though, then they shouldn't be allowed to take those risks. Am I right? Am I wrong?

The worst part is that no one really knows if the bailout is a good idea or not. Yes, all the financial institutions think it's a great idea: "Yeah, yeah, buy all our failed investments. Do that. That'll save the economy and my private jet"

But who can you trust? The Economist is plugging for a bailout, but can we really consider their advice to be objective? I don't think so.

Where does the money from the bailout come from? China?


Comment by Damo

September 30th 2008 22:53
Cibbuano

Thanks for your comments.

As far as has been explained by most of the radio economists (for what they are worth) it appears as though the bailout is more psychological than an actual fix. They USA is worried about fall in credit confidence which will stop banks from lending.
One figure quoted was that wealth consist of ratio of 30 to 1. Credit to actual assets. That to me looks like one very big house of cards.

However if the banks stop lending then the economy stops dead. Many companies draws wages on credit as they wait for their major creditors to pay.

So imagine you have a son who gets drunk and wipes off your Ferrari. The insurance won't pay. So you are stuck with a big bill for something that you did not cause.

Unfortunately I think the USA is over a barrel and they can't do much else.

Comment by D. Armenta

October 7th 2008 22:39
Yeah. We're over an oil barrel.

I'm doing my damnedest to tell everyone here about independent pres. candidate Ralph Nader, who offers practical solutions ...yet gets no airtime and is blocked from the presidential debates.

Comment by Damo

October 8th 2008 06:57
DA

Thanks for your comments.

I am not going to complain about you campaigning for Nader on orble because there is a whole chorus of people campaigning for Obama and McCain. What is one more?

BTW do feel better after they passed the bill to spend your money to save people who lost your money?

Comment by D. Armenta

October 8th 2008 14:01
Damo,

It's not so much campaigning as pointing out that there are other options. A two-party system doesn't work when both sides want the same thing.

Feel better?! Hell no. Why do you think I'm bringing Nader up all the time? I'm sick to death of the whole tap dance between the Big Two. Nader wants all the parties involved in that royal scam of a bailout to be held accountable, and he outlines how he'd do it.

Comment by Damo

October 8th 2008 20:02
DA

'In a plural dominated system, why throw you vote away?' says Kang.

Comment by D. Armenta

October 9th 2008 14:51
I'm sure glad Kang wasn't sitting next to Rosa Parks on that bus.

Kang has bought into the party myth that Americans can't change the system.

He omitted the rest of it: Cynical, complacent and uninformed Americans can't change things.

The rest of us can.

Comment by Damo

October 10th 2008 02:51
DA

America can't change?

In my universe I think presidents should be like Governor Generals.
Heads of state with no real power.
Good for cutting ribbons and little else.

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Notify extra people about this comment
Is this a private comment?
List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this comment


One per line max of 30

List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this private comment thread. Only the people in this list will be able to see or reply to your comment.


One per line max of 30

Your Name
(for the email going out to the above list, it can be different to your Orble Tag)
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
3 Posts
16 Posts
28 Posts
906 Posts dating from September 2006
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0
Moderated by Damo
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]