Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login

My Apologetics - February 2007

Your Level of Incompetence

February 28th 2007 04:04
Your Level of Incompetence

Have you reached for the stars and found that they were just a set of old Christmas lights. Have you started a grand march into the future merely to stumble in the bog? Do you harbor great ambition but find every single one beyond your reach? If you have given up trying to better and more focused, it you are satisfied to wallow away counting the days till retirement and perhaps even death, then perhaps you have reached your level of incompetence.

The level of incompetence of every individual is the highest level to a person can reach and do the most damage. Scott Adams created another similar principle called the Dilbert Principle where incompetent employees in a company are promoted to limit the damage they are doing at a lower level. As such we find managers that know nothing about managing, CEO that know nothing and CFO’s that have no knowledge of numbers. A person can be promoted very high before they reach their ultimate level of incompetence but a person will never exceed their level of incompetence. Everyone is aware of the incompetent individual but the only way to remove the problem is to promote the person higher. Sacking the person is not an option because the person who would sack such a person is usually the person who gave such a glowing report to give them the promotion. Hence you may often hear a manager complain, “I wish I never promoted that fool, now I can’t get rid of him.”


Some people remain at lower levels in a company acting as supervisors, junior mangers and HR staff when they find their level of incompetence. The maximum damage that they can do is limited because people are aware of the dangers of letting them go higher. Yet others can reach for the highest heights before it is obvious to all that they have reached their level of incompetence. They can be CEO’s, Prime Ministers or even Presidents of the Free World before everyone realizes that some terrible mistake has been made and now it is too late to fix it. The maximum damage will be all the greater the higher the person is placed.


Some examples of people reaching their level of incompetence can be seen in the world. Hitler was suited to being a ruthless dictator but as commander in chief of the army he incompetent; so incompetent that the allies decided not to assassinate him to speed up the war effort. Stalin’s planned a final purge of all the Doctors in Russia was only prevented when he died suddenly. Maybe some one should have sent for a doctor? A certain President of a Certain Free World (hint, hint) seems to be obsessed with starting wars over false pretexts and instead of looking for a way out, looks for another war.

How do recognize the signs of someone having reached their level of incompetence? One clear sign is that number of damaging mistakes a person does. If the damage is minor or temporary then it is possible that the person is yet to reach their level of incompetence yet. If the damage is lasting, passed onto another generation and huge it is clear that this person has reached or is close to reaching their Level of Incompetence. The 100 years war must have taken a monumental effort and teams of people who had reached their level of incompetence. Another sign is the amount of meaningless jargon and weasel words a person uses. Jargon is used to fill in the gaps in a person’s life where thoughts may occur. If in doubt over any subject, jargonize it and you will sound smart with out actually being all that smart: “Meaningful dialogue” instead of having a talk about something; “Paradigm Shift” instead of a change; “Unilateral Warfare” instead of they killed themselves; “Downsizing,” sacking staff; “Rightsizing,” sacking even more staff; “Labor Crisis,” we sacked too many staff but want them back on lower pay. “Globalized Workplace,” Who else can we sack?

The level of incompetence can also reflect it self collectively, such as: A board of directors caught robbing the company’s money or even government departments. Here is an example from a Centrelink brochure 'If you cannot read, this brochure tells you where to get lessons.' And this, 'It's not an identity card ... it's an access card that's used to authenticate identity.' A spokeswoman for Human Services Minister Joe Hockey.

What is important to know is that everyone has a level of incompetence that they can strive for but few ever achieve their full potential. I encourage people to take that as a challenge, push the envelope and one day you too can achieve you proper Level of Incompetence.

83
Vote
   


Needs and Wants: No BS.

February 26th 2007 23:48
Needs and Wants: No BS.


We often hear about issues in the media that is painted as deadly serious and something urgent. Often it can be as banal as the love life of another film star or the drug charges for a super model. We are told the personal details of a person’s private life because we are told that we have a right to know. It is as if we need to know who is sleeping with whom or something drastic will happen. Commercial inform us about the latest innovation and try to tell us that we need it. We need a plasma TV, we need a laptop computer, we need an Ipod, we need a SUV, we need a beautiful big house; we need the latest clothes. In fact everything in the commercial world appears to consider wants as needs. There is nothing wrong with wants but to confuse them with needs is a crime against logic. Instead of finding a need in order to fill a need, we have a situation where needs are invented to sell a product.

Needs come in several forms and many people disagree with a strict definition so I can only state needs as I see them. Generally we have Physical Needs, Emotional Needs and Spiritual Needs. Some may disagree on the last two however others may claim that they are more important than the first. “Man does not live by bread alone…”

In terms of crucial to survival the physical needs are an easy winner and are often referred to as food, shelter and clothing. Solving those problems, albeit Spartan in its approach, it does ensure self survival. An Ipod does not ensure survival so it is not a physical need, it is a want. We may want an SUV for various reasons but how many of those reasons are to do with image, status and leisure? In other words, how many are wants. Emotional needs can be Love, Happiness, Unity, and Feeling Safe. Spiritual Needs can overlap with the emotional needs but Includes Religion, a Sense of Purpose to Life or even the basis of your ethics and morality. Not every person will have the exact same emotional or spiritual needs but they will have some of the same. Hence we have Karl Marx dismissing Religion as the opiate of the masses and Lord Buddha seeing it as crucial.

Wants are desires and we as human are completely tethered to desires. We torn by desires and pulled in all sorts of directions. Should I eat; should I sleep; that girl looks hot; should I be writing this now; should I be doing something else. Knowing that they are wants frees us to chose which ones are important and which can be put off for now. An immediate life threatening need, such as a knife wound, must be dealt with before death occurs. Some people will do their best to blur the line between needs and wants in order to fulfill their own desires. A mobile phone ceases to be a form of communication but becomes a status symbol and a sign of social worth. “Mine has a camera and Mp3 player, but yours only makes calls.” Cigarette and tobacco companies try to portray their product in terms of Civil Rights and Big Brother Government oppression. Suddenly smoking is a right and needed to protect us all from tyranny, whereas it is actually a health issue. People choose to smoke or they are addicted to smoking. Taking smokes away will in no way harm a person, so it cannot be seen as a need.

If we have any doubts as to whether Needs and Wants can be separated we need only look at our possession and compare those to people who have less than we do. How does a family living in a dung floor shanty with a few meager possessions manage to live a happy and meaningful life? This is quite common and can be seen in many developing nations. What they have may not be much but if it is what they need then that is seen as true wealth. Prosperity and increased standard of living are good things, but if suddenly lost everything I am certain we would soon know the difference between Needs and Wants.
48
Vote
   


Who do I have to Kill?

February 25th 2007 23:51
Who do I have to Kill?

The world loves the word kill, execute and justice as all three are the same thing. Television and movies love it all the more as justice is not done until the antagonists is killed. Killing means closure in a psychobabbling sort of way. Killing means absolute and final justice. Now that the dead guy is dead we can all have a sigh of relief and prepare for the next evil doer. Does the punk feel lucky? Not anymore because we have the right, nay the duty to kill, kill, kill. It is like the Sacred Cows song, “Thrill, thrill, thrill….Kill, kill, kill…Bump off the square…,” Such exquisite meaning to a world that needs to satisfy its blood lust more than the crowd of the Circus Maximus. We came for blood and that is why our thumbs are pointing down.

In the other form of mindless entertainment called commercial news and current affairs we get the tabloid version the Circus Maximus. Highly filter news, chosen for their sensationalism and presented by people who are unashamedly biased is a great place to sell the product of Killing. ‘The chapter of Saddam’s life was closed with his hanging; death row is necessary to fulfill closer for the victims; that Damn Bosnian war criminal will escape the death penalty.’ It becomes like poetry and prose after a while where the terrible crime must not do time. The industry execs need to be fed, so just for sport we are going to make sure you are dead.

When we talk of capital punishment giving closure to the victims what are they really closing? Is a book that was opened when the crime occurred and now we have a dead body it can be closed forever? Is it a kind of mental stress that is fed endorphins as you watch the criminal die? Perhaps there is no such thing as closure and the best we can offer people is revenge. Calling capital punishment revenge killing may not sit well with some people who love to claim victim hood. Yet if an execution is to provide closure or a satisfaction to an aggrieved party, then what else is it? The criminal is trapped and cannot escape, so this not a case of self defense, it is a case of deliberate and ceremonial killing.

In the War on Terror both ex President Clinton and President Bush have at times tried to show who was the most effective killer. Bush with his repeated phrase of “Captured or Killed” and Clinton with his boasting of sending cruise missiles. It is as if they were beating their chest trying to show who really has balls to Kill more of the enemy.

The question that must be asked is why are so many people fascinated with killing other people? Conventional Weapons become more deadly as time moves on and we can now destroy entire cities in a month of shelling. It is all okay to kill civilians as long as you call it ‘Collateral Damage’. Everyone knows it means killing but for some reason it is a satisfying form of killing, when the victim is guilty by proximity to the enemy’s location. Collateral victims may be seen as only having themselves to blame for being in the way of that cluster bombing.

Killing could also mean power. The ultimate power over someone is to kill them. Is killing popular because it gives the impression of being powerful? Do people get off on killing or hearing about killings? Do we justify killing in rational manner to satisfy a primal urge for ultimate power? How many people have downloaded videos of executions and watched them over and over again. They are not performing the execution but watching and sometimes dreaming of doing it. Often we hear the in the debate about capital punishment of a person boasting that would love to pull the leaver for an execution. I have heard one woman on talkback radio say that criminals should have air injected into their blood stream. It was interesting how quickly the lines between justice, revenge and thrill killing can be blurred. To kill a stranger or lover in a brutal manner is evil but to create a ceremonial brutal execution is not evil in this woman’s mind. The results are the same and perhaps even the motivations of dominance and sadism are the same but one is scorned and the other applauded as telling it like it is.

‘Who do I Need to kill’ is not a complicated question. The operative word is ‘Need’. Short of an immediate and inescapable situation of self defense there is no ‘Need’. The real question is, ‘Who do I want to Kill?’
66
Vote
   


46 out 49 Nations vote to abolish Cluster Bombs

Clustb
Cluster Bombs can sit unexploded decade after a war is over
Some months ago I wrote a post asking why Cluster Bombs could not be banned


[ Click here to read more ]
36
Vote
   


Domino Theory Dick Cheney is in Town.

February 24th 2007 00:18
Domino Theory Dick Cheney is in Town

Cheney
Domino Theory Cheney: The flags make me look both patriotic and loyal to Australya
I guess that there is still some small part of the world, perhaps part of the brain that loves to deceive itself. After four years of achieving a worse world and a more dangerous world due to the war in Iraq we now have Cheney telling us it is all going to be fine. Just follow the plan and see it through to end and it will all be better. This is just a time of trail and it will pass. The old Domino Theory documents have been dusted off, scanned and edited in word for the modern world. Where the word Communist appears it has been replaced with Terrorist; where there was infiltration we find sleeper cells; where we had the Red Menace we now have Jihadists; where we had atheist indoctrination we now have Islamic Indoctrination. The rest of the Document was unchanged and just as useful to Cheney


[ Click here to read more ]
54
Vote
   


Spitting the Dummy?

February 23rd 2007 02:59
dummy
Spitting the Dummy - To give someone a piece of your mind without thinking it through. To crack the shits with someone or thing.
Spitting the Dummy

Reading over several different blog sites on the internet and letters to the editor you will see a range of responses. Some people ask simple questions; others ask leading questions; others bark and others bite. The golden rule in any place where someone is speaking is to remember that people pretty much see bad behavior as unacceptable. Even if you are defending a noble cause, shouting someone down makes you look like a goose. Insults and idle threats are just signs of stupidity and many will ask if an idiot like this promotes the idea it must be only idiots follow this idea. So how does it happen that people who would speak in calm terms face to face suddenly become tyrants when hidden behind the mask of anonymity? I propose it is the frustration of thinking that the person is being ignored. The result of which is the ‘Dummy Spit’ or ‘Spitting the Dummy’ as it is usually referred to


[ Click here to read more ]
62
Vote
   


bombom
Multiculturalism?
Multiculturalism: What are your thoughts?

Again I am going to leave this as an open forum where people co leave there opinions without me trying to influence your answers


[ Click here to read more ]
100
Vote
   


Howard
It all makes to me. Less is more unless we need more.
Howard increases troops as Blair reduces: Is there something wrong here?

Just a few days ago Australian Prime Minister John Howard gave a commitment to increase the number of Australian military in Iraq. His argument was that any reduction of troops would be a signal to the ‘terrorists’ that we were weak. The ‘terrorists’ would become ‘emboldened’ and this would increase the threat to Australia’s interests. The case was simple: No reduction in troop numbers incase we look like we are ‘cutting and running


[ Click here to read more ]
46
Vote
   


Dune: Parody of the Modern World

February 20th 2007 02:18
book
What a book cover hey?
Dune: Parody of the Modern World

The strange thing about the novel Dune by Frank Herbert is how it is just a contemporary today as it was when it was first penned. As a novel its reputation proceeded it as either a piece of space opera or as the first classic novel using science fiction as the setting and theme. The translation into film was deemed to hard for many years and if not for Star Wars ripping off much of its style and theme it would still be the defining serious Sci-fi novel. Prior to the Dino DeLaurentis version in 1984 the only other attempt to create it in media was done by the German electronic pioneer Klaus Schultze. The album called Dune does not follow the story but produces soundscapes to reflect Schultze’s his respect for the themes of water conservation


[ Click here to read more ]
55
Vote
   


Working in Explosive Factory Part 4: Send for Brains

This story is true and only the names have been changed


[ Click here to read more ]
47
Vote
   


When Books Get Discredited but Still Sell

Let’s start by thinking about some of the best sellers over the last few decades. It is as if a whole slice of history and science has been hidden from the general population only to be made available by the non mainstream. We could believe that there is an establishment of secret and unseen forces trying to suppress this new knowledge or we look at the controversial claims. Perhaps the world is exactly how it is portrayed on the X-files and we are just puppets to much greater and more powerful forces. Forces that have a hidden agenda and are so well connected that they control the entire establish academia could be possible. Then again such a great conspiracy stretches the plausibility beyond reason because of the huge amount of wasted resources to maintain. How would every University and Government in the world agree on one false history when they cannot agree on anything else? It is entirely possible that there are number books that pretend to be knowledge but are actually a sham


[ Click here to read more ]
53
Vote
   


TV Addiction: Someone Please Help!

February 15th 2007 23:18
TV Addiction: Someone Please Help!

86
This is a very addictive drug. If you can quote almost every line you are hooked.
I confess to all you here that I am a TV addict. Brrr that feels so much better. It is as if the weight of the world and my dirty secret has been brought out into the open. And like all addicts admission is the first part of the cure, some call it the first step


[ Click here to read more ]
68
Vote
   


The Continued Occupation of Iraq: Is it Flawed Logic?

rudd
Kevin Rudd- Leader of the opposition.
howard
Prime Minister John Howard
The unexpected result of John Howard’s swipe at Obama was the re igniting of the Iraq war debate in Federal Parliament. Despite all the rhetoric and gusto I am sure this was never intended by Howard. In stead it is more likely that he wanted to drop a quick jibe and move on to other things. Instead the last two days has been a contest of between the Prime Minister and the Leader of the opposition Kevin Rudd. Many a water cooler around Australia is buzzing with the ramifications of Johnnies words. Yet what is coming out of now is the points of difference between the government and opposition positions on the war in Iraq. Kevin Rudd favours a staged with drawl and John Howard favours stay until Iraq is stable. Needless to say the rhetoric for both sides has gone up culminating in Rudd challenging Howard to television debate on the issue. Howard refused claiming that the parliament was the proper place to debate the issue. Yesterday Rudd challenged Howard to a one hour debate in the House of Representative but this offer was also refused. Instead it was left to the noisy question time to address the matter


[ Click here to read more ]
57
Vote
   


What happened to the Australian Republic?

Remember the great Australian Republic debate nearly 10 years ago. At the time the old Parliament House was turned over to a selection of interested and prominent people who had strong views on the matter. The central questions were simple: Should Australia become a Republic and what form should that Republic take? The questions were debated over a period of 3 weeks with a show of some of Australia’s brightest minds, intellectuals, business leaders and even religious leaders. Monarchists debated against Republicans, Conservatives against Progressives, Left against Right, and Proposal against Proposal. At the end of the debate several matters were to be presented for a possible referendum to change the Australian Constitution


[ Click here to read more ]
56
Vote
   


Politicians in a Paradise Lost

February 13th 2007 01:15
Politicians in a Paradise Lost

anna
If it stops moving, wack an election poster on it. Who cares if it is someone elses front wall?
The thinking of politicians has fascinated and repulsed me from time to time. In Australia we live what is called a free and open democracy but we also like to talk about where it needs improvements and where it is not free. I have spent some time in Sri Lanka making several trips; the last trip was for a period of approximately 3 months living in a house with my family. Away from the shelter of the sterile hotels and the insular life of the tourist I was able to see the real nation and the real people. Close friends still work in a large variety of positions and jobs. Some in high positions and other in much more humble positions; they are all the same status in my mind


[ Click here to read more ]
62
Vote
   


Septic Tanks: A serious problem?

February 12th 2007 23:06
Septic Tanks: A serious problem

Today we have septic tanks of all kinds, shapes and sizes. However some are good and other bad. Does anyone have any ideas of what should be done with the bad septic tanks


[ Click here to read more ]
53
Vote
   


Howard lashes out at Obama.

February 11th 2007 23:06
Howard lashes out at Obama.

obama
Presidential Hopeful Obama. Too soon to know whether he will win nomination
In case you have been living on Mars and missed the news aver the last few months Senator Obama is a Democrat hopeful for the Presidential race. He is competing against Hillary Clinton to have a chance at being the nominee for President. Obama was a virtual unknown in Australia until recent times, much of the US reports have focused upon the unique symbolism of the two lead Democrat candidates; Hillary as the first female President and Obama as the first possible African American President. Symbolic candidate don not always make good choices as is shown by the number of Actors turned politicians throughout Asia. So it is the substance of the policies more than the colour of the person’s skin or their gender that should be the decider. It is this issue of policy over the war in Iraq that has been the point of difference between the Bush administration and his detractors. Obama has declared that he wishes to have a defined exit strategy and cut off date so that the war in Iraq can be ended quickly. Bush gives no such assurance and instead hints at a war that could stretch on for decades beyond his rule


[ Click here to read more ]
55
Vote
   


Is this For Real 2: The Answer

February 11th 2007 01:40
4reel
?


The Image used in yesterdays post was sent to me by a friend. Instantly it made me ask two questions: Is this For Real? and, Is it a fake


[ Click here to read more ]
75
Vote
   


Is This For Real?

February 9th 2007 03:34
Take a look at the copy of a drivers permit and tell me what you think.
Is it real or is it fake?
Give reasons for you answer.
permit
Why Bother?
93
Vote
   


David Hicks: What are My Thoughts?

February 9th 2007 00:26
David Hicks: What are My Thoughts?

Justice
Justice is meant to be bind to prejudice regardless of the severity of the accusation. Nothing says that more than this Lady
The other day I left a post to se what other people thought about David Hicks, the Australian Guantanimo Bay Detainee, being charged. I did receive some interesting replies and view points that were definitely peoples own. The purpose of my experiment was to see how a controversial issue is interpreted by a social group. As such it would be unfair of me to comments about the comments people left. The post was advertised as “Your Thoughts” and not mine. However this post is correctly labeled and so I will give my thoughts on the matter


[ Click here to read more ]
43
Vote