Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login

My Apologetics - January 2007

The Folly of Continued Warfare

January 31st 2007 12:09
The Folly of Continued Warfare

War is not a pleasant or noble task, nor is the sport of gentlefolk in their clear and neatly pressed uniforms. The image of young rugged face with a cool determination and a five ‘o’ clock stubble is as much myth as anything we have in fairytales. Courage is limited to how many people this person has been able to kill. He has physical courage to be ruthless and at the same time devoid of all other forms of courage. This is the kind of soldier that is expected to be the force sent to the front lines in every war. A soldier that is able to come home on a weekend pass and act like a perfect hero, then when leave is over return to lay waist to the enemy. With the message in his mind that every enemy killed is one less, the duty is clear and should never be questioned. Diplomacy is just a word, a farce and a pointless delay to a fight that should never be avoided. The enemy is evil and must be eliminated one body bag at a time.


To kill or capture the enemy is the theory that is has been promoted since the outset. Such theories are fine if you are a person totally devoid of any inhibitions to killing. In other words you must be able to kill without hesitation and suffer no remorse. To kill a human is easy but to kill an idea is not. To kill an ideal with a bullet or a bomb is nearly impossible. You must eliminate all who believe in that ideal. This is not a job for soldiers who shake your hand, or return home to work in the office beside you. This is a job for an assassin and butcher. It is a job for someone that can mercilessly destroy cities and execute civilians. We on the home front do not like the slight smear of blood when we shake hands with this people. We want them to do their work, kill whom they need to, eliminate the ideal. Even if that ideal live in the mind of a small child it must be removed, blow away the brain the hold and protects it, then leave the useless corpse as warning to others. This plan is perfect and will work because one more dead person is one less person holding the ideal.


You speak of martyrs and revenge; we know only one concept eliminate the evil by any and all means. More dead now will mean less dead later. So even if our enemy becomes enraged by seeing its people humiliated and tortured; wild at the site of their dead children, we still must continue. It is too late to turn back now, the hate us. They hate for killing them and their children. They hate us because we are good. That is why we destroy their cities, take their oil profits, torture their people because we are good and must survive. Even if we must wipe out the entire population we must survive because we represent all that is good in the world. It is too late, war can never be stopped because if we stop then they will say we were wrong. Do you want to hear that we were wrong?

Do not look into the soul of your leaders, they know best and you should feel thankful that they are here to protect you. They will protect you by killing more enemies and if we must, we will resort to genocide. We will do this to save us for the future because we are good.
44
Vote
   


Induction: Is it the best way to think?

January 30th 2007 01:40
Venn
Failure to grasp this logic will give an ' F' on any test
Induction: Is it the best way to think?

King: “I am going to pass a law to prohibit the movement of apples”
Minister: “Why is that sire? Is there something wrong with apples?”
King: “Most certainly, apples are evil. They are part of a Communist plot.”
Minister: “I fail to see the connection Sire. Perhaps you could explain it to me.”
King: “It is obvious. Are you some kind of idiot? Apples are red. Communism is Red. So logically Apples are Communists.”
Minister: “Well I cannot argue with logic Sire, it is perfect in every way.”

Notice something wrong here? Is the King right to assume that because apples are red they are also communists? He has used a logical process to join the two but is the process flawed?

What we have is clear example of ‘Inductive Thinking’ used to prove a false hood. So what is ‘Induction’ and how should it be used correctly.

‘Induction’ is way of explaining the relationship between Cause and Effect. We need to think ‘Inductively’ in almost every logical process of the mind. Without the relationship between Cause and Effect being established all logic becomes chaos. This is often referred to as ‘Causality’ meaning everything must that happens must have a sequence of events that precede it. The relationship of the preceding events is direct and the final event we are studying cannot occur without them.

For example: We find a broken glass on the kitchen floor. It did not just appear there randomly as if created by magic. How did it get broken? Causality is the sequence that occurred for the glass to be broken on the floor. ‘Inductive Reasoning’ is how we determine what these events may have been. I say ‘May Have’ because evidence may also be missing. The most likely explanation is that the glass was either dropped or thrown on to the floor at such a velocity that it shattered. We have good reason to believe that glasses do not move by themselves so something or someone moved it. ‘Elementary my Dear Watson.’

So the events that occurred are this: Something moved the glass, the glass hit the floor, the floor was harder than the glass. The glass shattered. The implications are that when ever a glass hits the floor it will most likely shatter. Finding who or what moved the glass is a question of ‘Deduction’ which I will deal with in another post.

Another simpler example of ‘Induction’ is when you type on a computer. If you notice that hitting the keys make words appear on the screen, you could easily assume that there is a causal relationship. Inductive Reasoning will make the link this way: Pushing keys makes words to appear on the computer screen. Repeating the action proved the assumption empirically.

‘Inductive Reasoning’ is so tied up in everything that we do that we cannot ignore it.

There is a dark side of Induction and how it is often misused to force a banal in logically incorrect point.

If I was to state that All Socialists are Communists would I be correct?
Assuming that all Communists are Socialists is logical but does the sum work both ways?
Following through this reasoning to its logical conclusion shows its direct flaw.
For example:
All Communists are Socialists,
Therefore all Socialist are Communists.

What about National Socialists (Nazis)?
Using this form of Induction we must conclude:
That if all Socialists are Communists,
The Nazis are Socialists,
Therefore all Nazis are Communists.

But Nazis are not Communists and that is the flaw in this reasoning.

Not every equation can be reversed and a simple understanding of Venn Diagrams is enough to see how this is wrong.
Mathematically this logic can be proven as wrong also.
All “A’s” are subset of “C”,
All “B’s are also a subset of “C”,
But “A” and “B” do not intersect.
Saying that they do will give you an “F” on any test

The mathematics of this problem may be boring but it is the same logic we use in normal conversation.

It is common to hear throw away lines like:
“The only Good Indian is a Dead Indian.”
“Every Terrorist is Islamic, they all the same.”
“All Southerners are Red Necks, Just like…”
“All German’s are Nazis…”

Inductive thinking is good when used correctly but when used incorrectly descends into simple prejudice. The obvious questions were never asked and the assumptions are that all the available data has been considered. The obvious flaws in any ones ‘Inductive Reasoning’ will come out when properly examined against its false assumptions and sweeping generalizations.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venn_diagram

81
Vote
   


Define Dickhead

January 29th 2007 10:24
MATURE CONTENT
   


Is BUSH Satanic: Part 2

January 28th 2007 23:03
Is BUSH Satanic: Part 2

satanic salute
From the Satanic Bible
Further evidence that supports this claim has been published on several web sites around the world. Yet Bush (GWB) is insistent that he is a fine upstanding Christian Leader who is capable of leading the Free World. We must take note of his membership of the ‘Skull and Bones’ Fraternity, a bazaar and exclusive lodge for collage elites, as his willingness to keep secrets from the world. His actions, such a starting wars and threatening military action can also be considered. Yet the so called ‘Satanic Salute’ offers a much more damning image of a man with deep dark secrets and hidden motivations


[ Click here to read more ]
54
Vote
   


Is BUSH Satanic? Part 1

January 28th 2007 02:35
bushsatan
Look carefully at his hand? Is this a Satanic salute?


Look carefully at the image of Bush and decide for yourself. George W Bush is quick to associate himself with Christian conservatives and says he prays often for guidance. Who is he praying to and what guidance is he getting


[ Click here to read more ]
89
Vote
   


Monty Python Reasoning

January 27th 2007 01:43
Monty Python Reasoning

fawlty
"Well you lot started it!"
Reading books and finding answers is a pleasure for most people. You will rarely find a person who reads searching for something to blacken the name of someone else. However such people do exist and they do make fodder for what I call some great Monty Python moments in life. Or even the Fawlty Towers moment: “Don’t mention the war? We you lot started it!” Forgive my distraction but a few moments of satire is worth hours of heavy reading. Satire and irony when used correctly offer great insights into an argument or the way people are thinking. The hidden subtext of what they are really trying to say


[ Click here to read more ]
59
Vote
   


Propaganda in 19 easy steps

January 26th 2007 04:30
Propaganda in 19 easy steps

Heir Garbage
If his propaganda was so strong, why did shoot himself?
Most people know that Goebbles was Hitler’s chief propagandist in Words War 2. In what is possibly the most well orchestrated campaign of hate and vilification in history he logically and deliberately planned half truths and lies for all forms of media. He placed a lot of faith in the belief that everything was based upon the perception it is given. Mein Kampf by Hitler was full of delusions of grandeur; a hate (of Jews) and an absolute contempt of ordinary people. Both men shared the belief that the wool could easily be pulled over people eyes because there were superior and inferior people. From Mein kampf: “The great masses of the people will more easily fall victim to a big lie than to a small one.”; “The broad masses of a population are more amenable to the appeal of rhetoric than to any other force


[ Click here to read more ]
78
Vote
   


Australia Day: What is the value of our passport?

Passp
If you have one of these, the Government will look after you?
I look back on the year and begin wonder what is that makes us Australian beyond just living here? There are the advantages and comforts that make Australia great and when I travel I do enjoy coming home and have my passport presented for that “Welcome Back Mate,” at customs


[ Click here to read more ]
62
Vote
   


Mass Panic 1938: War of the Worlds revisited.

wotw
Is it real because we believe it to be so?
Orson Welles was a giant of an actor even when he was quite young. His voice was like well a strung cello when he spoke, “who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of men. The shadow knows.” Cool stuff even today. Yet his voice was perhaps the single most dangerous thing about him when he decided to take on the story of War of the Worlds. Never afraid of the trying things in a new way he wanted to make the invasion from Mars into a contemporary American story. He chose a reporter style to add authenticity and pace where the line of reality would be artistically blurred. The ‘Blair Witch Project’ used a similar mentality with great success when many of the audience were not sure if what they were seeing was fiction. Upon reflection Orson Welles was breaking new ground in every direction


[ Click here to read more ]
63
Vote
   


Muslim Bashing: Bigotry by any other name?

There are certain web sites and blogs that I do avoid due to their mindless extremism. I could put links to sites that are little more that fronts for raising money for terrorism, but that would be unhelpful. Yet on these sites you will see the reasons and motivations for where terrorism finds it momentum. Grievances that are real and ignored become fodder to change depression to desperate action. Such sites hide their evil intents by showing images of massacres and dead children. The messages are clear. It is a call to do something courageously rather than sit passively watching as your ‘brothers and sisters’ suffer


[ Click here to read more ]
65
Vote
   


Myopic Intellectualism: The Man Who Loved Children

Several stories deal with the future and the horror that may come to pass. 1984 gave us Big Brother’s ever watchful eye, Brave New World a world devoid of pain but also devoid of purpose. Thomas Moore wrote ‘Utopia’ to show how humanity should live in harmony and ‘Mad Max’ showed a world where we could not. We are such clever beings to have the ability to warn ourselves against taking a wrong path and at the same time so stupid that we can ignore the warning signs. Intellectually we can say and think what we like. We are a brilliant people capable of brilliant arguments and tear down people with thunderous machinations of prose. The future we have and the future we want seem to be at odds. Yet we all have a plan to fix it, if only people would listen


[ Click here to read more ]
54
Vote
   


And the real contest is going to be between USA and China

The Chinese have destroyed one of their obsolete satellites with a surface to air missile. After two unsuccessful attempts the third missile apparently blew the low orbit satellite to bits. This demonstration of power has ignited speculation that it might spark a new arms race. Where the old Star Wars program became obsolete through treaty and the collapse of the Soviet Union, the new Star Wars arms race could star in China. One report linked this demonstration with a possible invasion of Taiwan. Where spy satellites would be knocked out, blinding a big part of the American strategy. Others may see this as part of a bigger picture where China is positioning itself as the new rival Super Power to match its booming economy


[ Click here to read more ]
66
Vote
   


Is Fiction doing our Thinking for us?

January 19th 2007 01:54
Is Fiction doing our Thinking for us?

24
If it is okay for Jack, is it Okay for me?
We would like to believe that society is full of objective and educated thinkers. That people so well informed that they understand that complicated international crisis have complicated causes and effects. We would love to believe that the people who are in positions of power, despite having differing viewpoint, have our best interests at heart. We would also like to think that television and film producers are responsible people who are only trying to entertain us, not influence us to some extreme agenda


[ Click here to read more ]
113
Vote
   


Think Pink because ‘You don’t wanna be a Stupid Girl’

Think Pink
Time to Think Pink?
It has been a hard week for Pink the modern Princess of Punk styles commercial pop music. With in a short period she has gone from producing a video clip that condemned Australian Wool as a product of cruelty and urged people to boycott the product. After receiving a letter from the Farmers Association explaining further details Pink made a sudden retraction of her statements and admitted that she had no researched the issue properly


[ Click here to read more ]
119
Vote
   


What Words do we Use to Sustain Us?

January 15th 2007 23:17
What Words do we Use to Sustain Us?

No doubt about it the life offers some pretty tough times. Few people who run into tough times can explain in times of justification and reason for the problems. Problems that defy logic and justice do tempt people to the brink of despair. Yet at the brink something draws people back and refocuses them upon the future. I have heard a description of humanity as being like angles fighting against a terrible wind that blows us unwillingly and backwards into the future. We would rather stay in a comfortable present or a more certain past but we have no choice as the winds of time are stronger than even the wings of an angel. Facing up to change and a new reality can often be hard that is why we are always fighting against this wind and staring helplessly at a past we can no longer reach


[ Click here to read more ]
79
Vote
   


What type of Blogger are you?

January 14th 2007 07:45
What type of Blogger are you?

In the interest of sweeping generalizations and stereotypes I have begun to think that Blogger’s fall in several categories. These categories are sometimes unintended but often they can seem intentional. Some writers have an audience in mind and play to this in the same way musician plays on stage. Choosing an approach or way of tackling an issue can often be conscious decision that has been arrived at through careful planning. Then again none us could really be that clever and we all just type out how we feel at the moment. However I would to argue that there types of approaches and styles that I will try to describe. Which one do you think suits you


[ Click here to read more ]
120
Vote
   


The Bush Push in Iraq: Mistake?

January 13th 2007 04:17
The Bush Push in Iraq: Mistake?

Historically background armies tend to fight wars based upon their previous successes. Unfortunately this can often lead to absolute failures. Wars have several elements to them: one of which is the fighting; the threat of fighting; the moral or will of the soldiers to fight; the will of the nation to support the war. Napoleon was quote as saying that an army loses when it is loses the moral belief in what it is doing. Hence he spent much of his time inspiring his troops to become efficient and morally courageous killers. Somewhere between Moscow and Waterloo this new morality must have failed him and his army


[ Click here to read more ]
110
Vote
   


Insurgency Theory and Practice

January 12th 2007 01:30
Insurgency Theory and Practice

cellstructure
Each layer is designed so that cells on the same level don't know each other
It is amazing what you can learn unintentionally by being exposed to the correct conditions. In the mid eighties I learned how to prepare the ‘wacky weed’, where to purchase it and how much to pay. I learned all this from the work colleges who were eager to teach me, even though I had and still have absolutely no interest in drugs. (Sorry to disappoint everyone). Similarly direct exposure and continued contact with friends and in-laws from a nation where a three way civil is raging you pick up a lot of information and I do mean a lot. In the west the say that there is six degrees of separation but in Sri Lanka my experience that it is no more that two, three tops. It is a society that literally knows everyone. Now war is a strange animal, you can be talking about some one day and then months later you hear that they were killed in a suicide bombing. For almost 20 years I have been in constant contact with the Island and have made several trips, my last stay was for a period of three months. I have been involved in several committees and projects that relate to this Island. Hence I do believe that I can speak with some qualification about what I have observed. Whether anyone else believes that I am adequately qualified, is a matter for them


[ Click here to read more ]
48
Vote
   


Word Engineering: Is it wrong?

January 11th 2007 03:19
Word Engineering: Is it wrong?

There is not shortage of people who cannot stand Politically Correct terms and words. Instead of falling down a man hole we look for a gender neutral word to explain. The chairman has become the chairperson (Ironically the term comes from chair-main a gender neutral term that was shortened over the years to chairman). It becomes irritating because the words that some people have invested an entire life using suddenly become obsolete and it as if we must learn a new language. It also raises many issues about the need and reason that such words should be changed. Are we really better off calling someone completely vision impaired rather than blind? Yet there is an entire industry based around the PC concept of words. There are books, lectures, education programs and even corporate enforced policies, all selling the notion that this is the way to speak


[ Click here to read more ]
66
Vote
   


A short example of Propaganda in Action

(Before writing this post I wanted to do a little research to verify dates and a few facts. Unfortunately the Internet has been almost completely inaccurate or guilty of omitting important details. Wikipedia only glosses over his history and does not offer any real insight into the person.)
[ Click here to read more ]
55
Vote
   


Iraq: The Dr Strangelove Solution

January 8th 2007 03:08
Iraq: The Dr Strangelove Solution

One my favorite Peter Sellers comedies is ‘Dr Strangelove’ a satirical poke at the cold war arms race. In the film a demented general launches an attack upon Soviet Union with several B52’s loaded with atomic weapons. Another film called ‘Failsafe’ took up a similar theme when a singe bombing crew believe that World War Three has broken out and they head of to do their duty. Both film were filmed in black and white and had some excellent lead actors telling a what if scenario. Yet Dr Strangelove with its edgy comedy and war room dramatics wins the competition for getting its message across


[ Click here to read more ]
55
Vote
   


Frankenstein: Monster for all Seasons

January 6th 2007 01:53
Frankenstein: Monster for all Seasons
franky
Don't Piss me off!

I doubt that Mary Shelley knew she had created one the icons of horror when she penned he book Frankenstein. This man made monster was actually born out of nightmare she had on her wedding night. If this sounds very Freudian, you could be correct. Her father was accused of being a domineering angry man that terrorized her childhood. Such a condemnation of her father may not be entirely true but it does give rise