Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login

My Apologetics - October 2006

Spin Doctors: What Good Luck!

October 31st 2006 23:35
Spin Doctors: What Good Luck

Does anyone else get the feeling that there must be a huge company completely dedicated to Spin Doctors? Is there a factory that stamps them out like identical toys? They were once kept in storage only to be brought out at election times and moments of electoral crisis now they are being taken out of the cupboard so often that the door has been ripped off. The Spin Doctor need only be fed negative energy in the form of information to start up and magically reverse the polarity of its input to produce a positive output. They work a like the old children’s book ‘Bad Luck, Good Luck.’ In the picture book we are shown a series of crisis that a person must face and their instant solution. “What bad luck, I fell out of an aircraft. What good luck, I have a parachute. What bad luck, it won’t open. What good luck, I heading for a bail of hay…” You get the idea? Only with the spin doctors it is: “What bad luck, we can’t find Bin Laden. What good luck, we can attack Saddam. What bad luck, people don’t like war. What good luck, we can say he has WMDs….” and so on.


In the current environment the spin doctor machines are running in overdrive. The US elections are on and there are so many things that require a reverse polarity that propaganda machine are being used for backup. The anti-Freedom of speech machine was getting a little tired and requires high maintenance. There is a sense of panic that due to the overload of work that may be all these machines may fail convert enough negative input to positive output.

Donald Rumsfeld is so concerned about negative media reports that he stated that it keeps him up at night. George Bush has stated that losing the elections would be a win for the terrorists. Closer to home the failure to find and WMDs in Iraq was changed from bad luck to good because Saddam was removed. The pit of recourses to create spin is as endless as it can rhetorically be.


Critics of the Spin Doctor machines claim that spin flies in the face of facts and won’t save anyone from a disaster. They show examples of how the greatest uses of spin: Hitler and Stalin could not hide their own failures. Even Mao, the darling of 1970’s communism, is taking a battering after his death. Spin can be seen as mindless propaganda so that even the most loyal follower does not lose faith in the leader. There could also be a fatal flaw in the basic design of a Spin Doctor machine, the flaw being the reality of overwhelming evidence. No amount of spin can hide the results of war forever. No amount of spin can hide a drought. No amount of spin can hide a famine. In the end it looks as stupid as the old book ‘Bad Luck, good Luck’.

‘What good luck, we can continue with the war. What bad luck, our economy is being ruined. What good luck, we have Spin Doctors. What bad luck, we can’t afford to pay them. What good luck….? Game over?” Well it was a stupid book anyway.


70
Vote
   


Madonna and the Adoption row

October 31st 2006 09:30
Madonna and the Adoption row

Sometimes you see stories about celebrities and just shake your head at their alien attitude to the world. You would expect that Madonna in her quest to do some good in the world would at least do some research on how to do the most good. Instead we have a situation where what is good for her must be good for the world.

Such is the delusion many childless couples have when they travel to developing nations and try to adopt children. They believe that by that serving their own needs is the same as the child’s needs. Some even go to the point of scanning the internet posting for potential children and are willing to break the laws of a foreign nation to do this. Most countries have strict adoption laws to prevent the exploitation of poverty stricken mothers. After the Tsunami the laws of adoption were tightened in Sri Lanka to prevent feeding frenzy of adoptions and questionable orphanages being setup. There was also the fear that orphanages would be set up in the most insane and unsustainable manner. People offered money to build an orphanage as long as it was on their own land. Other projects had enough money for a couple of years and then the children may be left to fend for themselves.

In adoption it is reasonably feared childless couples from the West would help bolster a black market in selling babies to the highest bidder. There have been sham hostels for pregnant single women that will be paid a pittance for delivering a healthy child. Meanwhile the owners of the hostels make a fortune out hopeful potential parents. Several years ago an Australian woman was stopped by authorities in Sri Lanka over an illegal adoption. The story made headlines for a few days with the woman determined to take back her baby.

The argument for adopting is justified in very extreme circumstances where no other solution can be found. This is where thing become confused as the adoptive parents become the judges of what those extreme circumstances are. They can see the lifestyle and poverty as too horrible to contemplate. The risk of disease and educational opportunities are all being weighed up. Soon they are finding any excuse to show how they are actually rescuing a child from a terrible situation rather than trying to adopt a baby to fulfill their own ambitions to have a family. Suddenly the interests of the child are being weighed up as predominantly physical. ‘We are richer than their family so we can better provide for them.’

This brings me back to Madonna and the African child she is in the process of adopting. Her excuse for doing this is to save the child from desperate poverty and the risk of disease. The child father has changed his story several times about where he agreed to the adoption but I won’t dwell on that point. I will however question whether something else could have been done, rather than separate a child from its sole remaining parent? With reports of Madonna boasting of spend upwards of $30,000 on gifts for the child there seems to a sort extravagance in one direction but little where it will do most good. Is it better that such an amount is spent in providing better health and accommodation to keep father and son together? Perhaps the money could be used on health and employment programs for an entire village instead of legal costs of the adoption? Has Madonna merely bought a baby the same way someone would buy a rare bird or an endangered tiger, then taken it from its home and loved ones? Or is she genuinely looking after the welfare of 13 month old David?

In her interview with Opera she berated the media for being to cruel to her motives. On another occasion she claimed that the media were going stop other children from being rescued from Africa. This may sound like pure damage control as she tries to justify buying a child from a dirt poor family in Africa. To others she may just be another rich Westerner taking a child from his culture and background to fill her own wants. Whatever the reasons you David’s life will not be the same again.
60
Vote
   


How do you get rid of the Call Center calls?

Without fail it is near 6pm and I about to sit down for dinner when the phone rings. A complete stranger speaks in urgent tones as he had just called for an ambulance and was put through to your number. Suddenly I am being greeted by my name and asked how are we today? (Am I some kind of mental patient waiting to dribble out my life story?) With out a second to answer I am bombarded with talk of a great offer and a free phone as no cost and no obligation, ‘An offer to good to refuse.’ The conversation carries on and all I want to know is how long before this person gets off the line.

More often than not a call comes up as overseas on my number display. If ask where the person with a heavy Indian accent is calling from I am told that they have an office in Melbourne. And pixies fly at the end of my garden? There is a delay and a slight echo that give this away as an overseas call, so I know I am being lied to. Whatever this person has to offer is now tainted by that lie. Every attempt I make to be rid of this nuisance is fruitless and they waist more of my time and my precious life.

Another call come just as I am about to watch television. (Grrrr) No point for guessing what country they say that they are calling from. “How are we today?” a ridiculously over familiar stranger asks. “Busy,” I reply in a cold manner.
“This will only take you a moment of your time and ….”
“Listen,” I interject, “Futurama is about to start and you are wrecking my personal time with the wisdom of Bender.”
“Could I call you back in one hour as this a very great opportunity for you to have a free holi…”
“Kiss my shiny metal ass.”

The next day at six I see ‘overseas’ displayed on my phone line identifier. Upon being answered a heavily accented man start rambling about a great investment opportunity. I wonder how long he can keep going before either stopped to take a breath or faint due to oxygen starvation. Damn he stops to take a breath then begins his next automated tirade. This time he asks questions that I don’t answer but that does stop him from continuing to preach about a free seminar. Finally he asks a real question of me. “And what do you thing of that?”
“No.”
“No what?”
“No I don’t but anything from a call from another country.”
“But we are here in…” He hesitates to read. “…Melbourne.”
“What’s the weather like today?” I love being a smart ass sometimes.
The weather is…” Papers rattle for a few seconds, “…fine today with a sight North Easterly breeze.”
My phone goes down.

Two days later a get a callas 5:50pm, they are getting smarter and so catch me off guard. Yet like a battle hardened soldier I am up for the fight. The person starts with the greatest of orgasmic enthusiasm about a great new phone offer. Do people actually get that excited over saving money off their long distance calls? I don’t. “Would you like me to explain how you can save money and get this great new phone for free?”
“Sure as long as we can talk about Jesus first.”
This time they hang up.

So what are people tactics for getting rid of that nuisance phone call trying to sell you stuff? I have to admit that these days I get a bit of pleasure out mentally tormenting the person on the other end of the line. Asking for a supervisor is one of my favorites, telling them that they have called another call center is another. “I’m sorry didn’t hear that the person you called died?” For surveys my first question is “Am I going to be paid for this survey?” If they are unwilling to fork up $30 per hour then it is good-bye.

What are people doing to be rid of the random phone pests?
147
Vote
   


Gallipoli: Anzac History Hijacked to Justify War.

To look at from every strategic angle the World War 1 battle on Gallipoli was an absolute disaster. It was a stupid tactic for a pointless gain that landed on the wrong beach. Even as the soldiers poured out of their landing craft on to the beach the Turkish army was mowing them down. The advantage to the Turks of a very steep incline was obvious. The Anzac (Australian and New Zealand Army Corp) troops had to shoot up hill at well protected posts. The beach was captured but the high ground remained in control of the Turkish army for months. Confusion reigned as thousands of troops were sent to reinforce the attack. Rather than helping the situation, the extra forces only provided more fodder for the enemy. Soon it became obvious that this battle was going to drag on but instead of ordering a retreat the order to stay was issued. The famous ‘Dig, dig, dig…’ command gave the Anzac forces their nick-name of Diggers and the name has stuck since. The stalemate continued on with the casualty number increasing. Occasion halt in the fighting were called so that the rotting, bloated and maggot infested bodies could be recovered for both sides. After months of pointless fighting the entire allied forces were withdraw in the matter of a few days. The number of casualties in the Gallipoli campaign was staggering to the population of Australia but by far the most significant casualty was Winston Churchill’s career. Seen as the architect of the disaster the public were scathing in their rebuke and his reputation as WW2 become evident


[ Click here to read more ]
66
Vote
   


What is Confronting Attire

October 28th 2006 00:48
Confronting Attire

The history of confronting attire did not start with the Moslems nor is it confined to the veils. There has been a history of people being upset by the way others dress and present themselves in public. Some women complain that they cannot get passed the ‘Door Bitch’ at some nightclubs due to their style of clothing. The more revealing the better for some clubs could be taken as a dress code that judges the fashion and not the person’s character. Nuns used to ware full habit several just a few decades ago but these it is rare to see a nun in anything other than casual attire. The argument to abandon the religious habit was based on the theory that a casually dressed religious person was more approachable and more acceptable to society. Migrants from Europe who kept to their traditional clothing were often the stuff of comedy until they conformed to a better style


[ Click here to read more ]
65
Vote
   


What is the toughest thing you have had to do when traveling?

The recollections of travel are some of my most treasured memories. They are also some of the toughest times that I have had to endure. Sometime you have to remind yourself that you are in another country and that you may have very little in the way of legal rights and support. Now you are the alien who is at the mercy of fate and faceless demons. So what do I think was the toughest decisions I had to make when overseas


[ Click here to read more ]
60
Vote
   


The End of the World as We Know It?

October 26th 2006 04:17
The End of the World as We Know It

I am not usually a gambler but I have made three serious bets in my life. Serious in so far that I believe that I cannot lose. One was with a work colleague years ago betting that Interplanetary Aliens would not reveal themselves to the public by the year 2000. Till this day he refuses to acknowledge defeat and accuses me of being part of the flat Earth mentality. Not believing in green men from Uranus is apparently a dead give away that you are some kind of luddite or aliens heretic. The other bets were to do with the end of the world. One person who owned a record store predicted that man would destroy civilization within 200 years and we would become savage cannibals to survive. He still has 180 years to go so I’m happy to wait and see. The last bet about the end of the world was with some who had been totally convinced that the year 2000 was to be the end of the world. As foretold in all the bible classes and interpretation of the religious leaders. Armageddon was written down to warn people about how to prepare for the last days, the days of the Beast etc


[ Click here to read more ]
78
Vote
   


The Werribee DVD: Sexual assult for $5

October 25th 2006 12:07
MATURE CONTENT
   


Why is there always a War over History?

October 24th 2006 05:44
Why is there always a War over History?

George Orwell once wrote ‘He who controls the Past controls the future’. We often hear that ‘those who fail to learn from history are destined to repeat it’. It is as if history itself has the control of our future destiny. We are seduced by romantic versions of history and would rather believe that our nation and its people are the critical pin that hold the world together. We are formed by the events of our past and those events are so unique that we have been forged as a better people. Yet the whole question of history is controversial as each historian writes out their narrative


[ Click here to read more ]
60
Vote
   


Bloggers Reality Check 2: Persecutions

October 23rd 2006 08:00
Bloggers Reality Check 2: Persecutions

Would you be willing to die for your views


[ Click here to read more ]
89
Vote
   


Is the Space Arms Race about to start again?

October 4, 1957 was a shock of reality for the USA. They had just received news that the Soviet Union had successfully put in orbit the first artificial satellite called Sputnik. The constant beep, beep, beep of Sputnik as it circled that planet made a mockery of western capitalist superiority and ‘good old American know how’. The backward primitive communist nation had beaten them into space and had now taken the strategic high ground. The panic was on as America scrambled to build a space program that would out do the Russians and reclaim the high ground. The technology gap was obvious as further Soviet satellites were sent into space carrying dogs and mice. As America scrambled to launch its rockets there was another shock for them: Yuri Gagarin became the first human to in space April 2, 1961. The Soviet Union was winning the space race, gaining the high ground and exploiting the propaganda advantage. It was the will of the proletariat masses verses the weak decadent imperialist. Soon after this President John F Kennedy declared that the US will put a man on the moon before the end of the decade. As the Eagle landed in a cloud of moon dust the high ground was claimed by the US as the Soviets slide slowly behind in the technology race


[ Click here to read more ]
80
Vote
   


Bloggers Reality Check: Who is Reading Your Posts?

Anyone who thinks that the internet is a closed and secure system is kidding themselves. When the Internet began I used to describe it as the wild west of communications. Sure it offered freedoms of expressions but you had to put up with so many cowboys, rustlers and snake-oil salesmen. Pages of information about every banal subject could now gain world attention through the click of a button. The growth was beyond the ability of corporate companies to stop and beyond governments to comprehend. It was glorious chaotic free market and uninhibited information sharing. Geeks were becoming heroes as an entire new industry exploded into existence. Freedom of speech and expression was now an unstoppable titanic


[ Click here to read more ]
248
Vote
   


The problems in finding peace

October 19th 2006 04:16
The problems in finding peace

Several years ago I invited to have dinner at a home on an air force base in Sri Lanka. The air base was originally built by the British and had comfortable quarters for the families of the officers. Security was reasonable for a base that was responsible for fighting a civil war and the old world charm of the place was like an oasis of clean in a developing nation. The wing commander showed me a helicopter gunship and explained that it was being used most days. He was quick to note that everyone knew that the civil war was the worst thing that that the island had to endure. It was draining over 70% of the economy and was contributing to the impoverishment of the people. The helicopter cost over US$40,000 a day to keep in the air. That was more than most of the population would earn in 10 years, an unimaginable amount for one day. There could be peace in short time if there was an effort to find it. “As much as the people want peace they won’t get it because there are other people who are getting rich of this war.” He explained with bitterness


[ Click here to read more ]
79
Vote
   


Sex Education: Is it helping anyone?

October 18th 2006 06:26
MATURE CONTENT
   


In a Choice between Madness and Insanity who would win?

The worm is starting to turn in Australia and for the first time in many months there is debate in the federal parliament over the war in Iraq. Blair and Bush have both taken a lot of heat over their decisions but Howard has been virtually unscathed till now. The war is an obvious blunder and had it been done by anyone other than governments they would have been charged with criminal negligence. John Howard now admits that he did not massage the intelligence on the build up to the war on Iraq but still espouses the ‘Stay the Course’ motto. Meanwhile the opposition is demanding a strategy to remove Australian troops from the conflict


[ Click here to read more ]
59
Vote
   


Can we Rationally Justify the Arts?

October 16th 2006 07:26
Can we Rationally Justify the Arts?

In a word no.
Defend the Art
Does this serve any purpose?

[ Click here to read more ]
71
Vote
   


Cars were invented by Satan

October 14th 2006 07:19
Cars were invented by Satan.

Motor cars have been around for over 100 years and in that time they have belched out pollution and eaten up resources. They have been the consumers of metal, paint, glass and plastic. The amount of tar that has been laid to enhance their movement is incalculable. So too have the hospital bills and funeral expenses as they sometimes go off these roads. We measure car death in terms of a toll that is either exceeded or reduced each year. So many cars are produced that millions are destroyed each year and melted down to make a new generation. We blame cars for the destruction of the environment and the protection of its fuel for the creation of wars. Yet has anyone ever suggested that motor cars were invented by Satan


[ Click here to read more ]
59
Vote
   


Who do you think deserves the Nobel Peace Prize this year?

It is Nobel Prize season and they have already been awarded to Science, Medicine and Literature. Yet the most prestigious award is the Peace Prize. Since its inception it has been the one that has captured the imagination of the world


[ Click here to read more ]
67
Vote
   


What is the one weakness of Modern Western Civilization?

Imagine that there is an oil spill threatening to contaminate the entire Great Barrier Reef. A collision between two super tankers has broken both ships apart and spilled all their cargo in to sea off the cast of Queens land. The only hope of destroying the leak would be to use genetically modified bacteria that breaks up crude oil. The oils are dissolved and the largest natural wander of the sea is saved. Yet as the bacteria were due to a lack of crude oil one strain survives. This eats certain forms of plastic a petrochemical product. The types of plastics it likes are the ones commonly used for electrical insulation


[ Click here to read more ]
36
Vote
   


ZPG: The Failed Theory

October 11th 2006 01:49
ZPG: The Failed Theory

By the early 70’s the main buzz phrase was Zero Population Growth (ZPG). The message being sent out to every nation on Earth was that we were having too many children. Not only were we having too many but we should stop doing it as soon as possible. The ‘two will do’ campaign was being sold to a generation that had already discovered the ‘Pill’ and ‘Free Love’ like coke is sold to this generation. ‘A couple only needed to have two offspring to replace themselves for the next generation’ a well made serious education film told the school children. Parents who had more were just plain irresponsible and threatening our very existence. Soon we would slip into the world shown in the film ‘Soylent Green’ where the population could no longer provide for itself and we would be facing famine. In India forced sterilization took place as a remedy to all its future problems. High school students were asked to write essays about the population explosion that condemned their very fertile parents. The mathematics was simple if everyone had less children then there would be more wealth to share for the next generation. The world was in a crisis that would destroy our comforts and cause global wars as a desperate overpopulated world fights like savages over the last scraps of food. Human beings were no longer a gift from heaven, they were a bomb, a plague of locusts swarming and consuming everything in site. Babies were horrid dangerous things that produced nothing and consumed more of the pie that were must all share in limited rations. In fact we would be seeing all this before the turn of the centaury. ZPG was the new God and questioning this god was an intellectual and moral crime


[ Click here to read more ]
53
Vote
   


Atomic North Korea Rocks the World

October 9th 2006 22:39
Atomic North Korea Rocks the World

Is it just me or are we trying to hard to sound tough and falling apart when it actually gets tough? The rhetoric over the last few years would have all believe that the world was on the verge of invading North Korea to prevent it from joining the Nuclear Club. They were part of the ‘Axis of Evil’ and therefore not suitable to own any atomic weaponry. Yet as North Korea built and tested long range missiles there was little else but talk and threats. There were threats of sanctions and little else to deter an atomic powered dictator from building up his stockpile. Monday 9th October 2006 it was confirmed through seismic reading that the North Koreans have detonated an atomic weapon underground. North Korea with this one action has forced itself through the backdoor into the Atomic Club


[ Click here to read more ]
51
Vote
   


Triumph of the Stupid?

October 9th 2006 02:30
Triumph of the Stupid

I often wonder when whether hard work and study ever produce the dividend that we were promised in school. I remember being told that if you don’t study hard and get at least a year 12 education you would be left on the scrap heap of society. You would be fit for only the most menial of all tasks. The modern world will need highly educated people that cope with the high levels of information. Failure to study and keep studying would lead to job like street sweeper, rubbish collector, can man, bus drivers and so forth. In fact the future for people without high levels of education was as grim as a feeble minded oaf or the village idiot. Education meant wealth, comfort and respectability


[ Click here to read more ]
47
Vote