Under the current constitute, Australia government have three houses, governor general, Senate and the Parliament. The Parliament is in charge of national executive duty. The two party system we are familiar with, is something set by the MPs themselves, not a system that exist within the constitute.
In my opinion, Australia government should have the following reform, on a constitutional level.
The current government should be separated into five houses.
The Parliament, the senate, Australia national administration council, Australia national anti corruption council, Australia Federal court, Australia military affair council and the office of the Prime Minister (independent from the Parliament) and the governor general.
The Australia national administration council, The Australia military affair council and Australia national anti corruption council, each have a Chief Minister as the head of the council, follow by a deputy chief minister. There would also be a sectary of Australia national administration council, sectary of Australia anti corruption council, sectary of Australia military affair council.
The Prime Minister should be elected by the people of Australia directly. Each term is 4 years, each person can be elected at most twice. During the election, candidate sign up in pair, one as Prime Minister and one as Deputy Prime Minister.
The Prime Minister should be the Chief minister of Australia military affair council. The Deputy Prime Minister should be the Deputy Chief of Australia military affair council. The sectary of Australia military affair council should be appointed by the Prime Minister.
The Chief Minister of Australia National administration affair council, should be appoint by the Prime minister, and would remain in power, till the Prime Minister have him replace or if himself resign. The Chief Minister of Australia National administration affair council, would appoint deputy chief minister and sectary of Australia National Administration Council.
The MPs of Parliament, Senate and Chief Minister of Australia national Anti corruption council, should be elected directly by the people, serving a three years term and with the exception of by election, the election of all three should be hold on the same day.
The head of each ministry within Australia national Anti corruption council should be appointed by the Chief minister of Anti corruption council.
The head of each ministry of national administration council should be appointed after it been selected by the national administration council's chief minister and agree upon by the Prime Minister.
For the chief minister of national administration council to pass a law, it must firstly be proposed and agree upon by the Prime Minister, then it must be agree upon, either by the Senate or the Parliament.
For the chief minister of anti corruption council to pass a law, it must be agree upon by at least two of the following three, the prime minister, senate and the parliament.
For the Prime Minister, senate and parliament to pass a law, it must be agree upon by all three houses. (Prime Minister, Senate and Parliament)
Under the current law, the justice of Australia court is appointed by the governor general. We should change this, with a Chief Chancellor of Australia federal court, been appointed, after it has been selected by the Prime Minister and agree upon by the Parliament and the Senate. Each Chief Chancellor serve a six years term and would be in charge of appointing justices, of federal court.
The Prime Minister official replace the Governor General as the Commander in Chief, of Australia defense force. At the time of emergency the Prime Minister have the power to declare martial law. But right after it, the bill must be send to the Parliament and Senate and if either the Parliament or Senate disagree with martial law bill, then martial law, must be dissolved. And when martial law is declare, if either Prime Minister, Parliament or Senate believe it is no longer necessary, then the Prime Minister must end martial law right away. At the time of national emergency, in the arena of nature disaster, economic crisis, foreign invasion and disease outbreak (E.g. SARS) and the parliament and Senate is at recess, then the Prime Minister has the power to make temporary law, that only need to be agree upon by the Chief Minister of Administration, but the law can last for one month maximum and must be immediately dissolved, if either parliament or senate disagree.
At the event where the Prime Minister is dead or capture, the Deputy Prime Minister should become acting Prime Minister, at the event where both Prime Minister and Deputy prime minister is dead or capture. The Chief Minister of national Administration, would become Prime Minister and the Deputy Chief Minister of Administration would be deputy prime minister, the sectary of national administration, should become the Chief minister of national Administration. If all Chief, deputy chief minister and sectary of administration, prime minister and deputy prime minister is dead or capture, the next ranking minister of the Australia national administration council, should become Prime Minister and the second as deputy Prime Minister and the third as the new Chief Minister of national Administration. If the entire national administration is gone. Then the Chief minister of anti national corruption, should become Prime Minister. National administration affair would be given to the Parliament, until a new Chief minister of national administration is appointed. the Sectary of national anti corruption council, would become the chief minister of national anti corruption council. If, the Prime Minister, Deputy Prime Minister, national admin council, national anti corruption all been wipe out. All national executive power, would temporary been given to the Parliament, until a new prime minister is elected, new anti corruption chief minister is elected and a new chief of administration, is appointed.
The governor General remain as the head of state and the Prime Minister should be within the constitute, the leader of the state. When and if Australia become a Republic, the Prime Minister would replace the governor general as the head of state and be rename as a President, the deputy Prime Minister should be the deputy head of state and rename as a Vice President.
The parliament should maintain the role of national executive, in arena not cover by the office of the Prime Minister, the Australia national administration council, Anti corruption council, the court and military affair council.
With the exception of the position as the head of state, all of the governor general's power within the federal government, should be given to the Parliament, Senate, The office of the Prime Minister, National Administration council, anti corruption council, military affair council, federal court, accordingly. With the exception of been the head of state, all other official duty and power of the Governor general as the head of state, should be given to the office of the Prime Minister.
The Parliament and the Senate can only be dissolved, when a new Parliament and Senate has been elected and the existing one must be dissolved to hang power to the new one. While still been a part of the Commonwealth, the power to dissolve the Parliament is within the hand of the governor general, but the governor general does not have the right to execute this power and the Prime Minister have the right to executive this power, on the Governor General's behalf. If Australia become a Republic the power to dissolve parliament, is within the hand of the President and the power to executive this power is within the hand of the President.
Australia constitute should define the term Australians as
A: Somebody who has indigenous Australian heritage
B. Somebody who is a citizen of the commonwealth of Australia
In addition, the Australia Parliament should have three Indigenous Australian seats, hold by people who have are both an Australian by constitutional definition A and constitutional definition B and elected by people who are Australian by both constitutional definition A and constitutional definition B.
Also, Australia Federal government, should encourage Aboriginal Australian cultures.
The Prime Minister of Australia, should be over 40 years old.
While been sworn into office, the Prime Minister elected should make the following oath saying "I do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the office of Prime Minister of the Commonwealth of Australia and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution and the people of the Commonwealth of Australia. If I break this oath, I am willing to be punished to the full extend of the law. So help me god."
When and if Australia do become a Republic the Prime Minister elected, whom is now call a president elected must take this following oath. "I do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the Republic of Australia and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution and the people of the Republic of Australia. If I break this oath, I am willing to be punished to the full extend of the law. So help me god."
The Commonwealth of Australia can be separate into the Australia freedom area and foreign or rebel occupation area, if any part of Australian soil is under the control of foreign occupation force or rebel forces. Election would be hold in the Australia freedom area, by citizens of the Commonwealth of Australia, within the Australia freedom area.
In addition, I realized, according to Australia's constitute, the people has no constitutional rights. So, I took a look at the constitute of some other countries and figure, these following constitutional right and responsibility, should be within the Australia constitute. (Because our country have no constitutional right, is what allow stuff like stolen generation to take place and recently, the Victoria government banning public protests)
1. All citizens of the Commonwealth of Australia are equal within the eye of the law, disregards to gender, religion, race, social status or political preference.
2 People have the right to religion freedom and not have any religion's law, practice and believe force upon them, against their will.
3. The law of the religion and the law of the state should remain separate.
4. The number six line of the original Australia constitute "The parliament have right to make law against people of particular race" should no longer be use
5. At the time of total war all men and women whom are citizen of Australia, should become reserves of Australia defense force and can be drafted
6. People have the right to freedom of speech.
7. People have the right to form community
8. People have the right to form public gathering.
9. With the exception of, the situation listed below, no law should be make, to interfere with the rights listed above.
A. When defending the freedom and constitutional right of those living in the commonwealth of Australia.
B. When dealing with enemy of the state, terrorist organization and criminal organization.
C. At the state of martial law, excluding member of Parliament and Senate.
D. To defend the existence of the Commonwealth of Australia or if Australia become a Republic, to defend the existence of the Republic of Australia
10. The Australia Federal Government, have the right to make law, towards any enemy of the state, people of particular terrorist organization and people whom are member of a particular criminal organization
In my opinion, this reform is better for Australia's democracy, human right and set a future for Australia when and if it decide to become a Republic. It also mean pulling away from the current two parliament system, where there are always at most two candidate for Prime Minister, people don't get to elect the Prime minister directly and the MPs, can change the Prime Minister, whenever they want
Please leave a message below and tell me what do you think about this constitutional reform. I really like to hear your opinions
For those who read my blog. I think you already know. I do not like the Catholic Church. Now, just to make it clear. I got nothing against Jesus. I think Jesus is a great man (or if you want to look at it from a religion point of view "son of god", but I ain't Christian, so I look at him from a historical point of view and that is saying I think he is a great man.) and to follow the teaching of Jesus, can be consider as a good thing.
But the problem with the western world, is that people mistaken the word of the Church, to be the word of Jesus itself. That is just wrong. I know a lot of Asian people in the west, who converted to Christianity. While asking them whether they converted to Catholic, Anglican or whatever version of Christian church, their answer is that "they follow neither", they choose to become a Christian, not because they believe, in the teaching of a church, but instead, it is because they believe in the teaching of Jesus.
This in my opinion, is right on. The church, is frequently been consider as religion itself, but that is wrong. Instead, the church should be consider as nothing more then a man constructed institute, design to serve the purpose, of been the medium, to help Christians, to better the understand the teaching of Jesus and the teaching of the Christian faith. It doesn't matter whether it is the Catholic church, Anglican church, Orthodox church etc. It is even more important to know that these church are operated not by god or gods, it is operated by man, independent by the Christian god or Jesus.
Take for example, it doesn't matter whether you are a Christian or not, anybody who live in the west, would know enough about Christianity, to know that in the Christian faith, all man are equals. Yet, for hundred of years, the Catholic church, have never at any stage spoke out against the western concept of "King is god's given right." and "a royal is better then a none royal, simply because he/she is a royal", nor has the Catholic church put such believe into the category of a "sin" within the Catholic church. Yet, it should be go without saying believing in "king is god's given right." is suppose to be a sin. Even if we don't look at things from a Christian point of view, royalty is a social constructed system, why should one person be better then another, simply because he/she rank higher in this social constructed system. Then the thing abut racism, didn't Christian myth said, the first human are Adam and Eve created by god? And didn't the Christian faith believe all men are equal? Yet, during an era, where people in the west, make distinguish between one and another base on race, yet, still within the Catholic church, racism is still not consider as a sin and to add to the irony, the Catholic church, played a major role, in assisting in the operations of the stolen generation. The biggest icon that put an end to racial differentiation in western history, ain't the Catholic church, it is Abraham Lincoln and Nelson Medulla. Even if we look at it from a none religion point of view, differentiating people base on race...I don't know about you, but in my opinion, unless it is in the field of studying human biology and you are studying racial characteristic, it is a stupid, pointless and meaningless exercise. Yet, racial differentiation and King is god's given right, ain't a sin, despite the fact it should be and Australia's Catholic church still haven't confessed to god, for playing an actively role, in supporting the policy of the stolen generation, which even none Christians can see should be consider as a sin, both within the Catholic church and outside the Catholic church and without question, it must be a sin within the eye of the Christian god.
In the recent event, there is the Catholic church saying "homosexuality is a sin" and their argument is in the bible it say a marriage is suppose to be a union between man and woman. But that ain't really screaming been gay is a sin, it just saying none heterosexual marriage is a sin. And to look at it from a none religion point of view, honestly, I don't think this whole gay thing ain't much of a big deal. But the Catholic church decided to go beyond just saying they don't approve gay marriage, to saying they don't approve gay all together and to a certain extend, it gone beyond that to discriminate people with homosexual tendency. There must be millions of people throughout the world, who do not like homosexual behavior, due to various form of reason, but it gives no right, to discriminate against people of such characteristic. I mean, I don't like it when people talk with their mouth full of food (so gross.) does it give me right to discriminate against people who conduct such behavior? Just because you don't like a particular characteristic, don't give us right to, put people of this characteristic into a bracket and discriminate against them. Anybody who read my blog, would know, I don't like homosexuality either, but this doesn't give me the right to discriminate against people with such characteristic. Personally, I am from East Asia and in East Asia, most people think homosexuality is sick, but never once in East Asia, does people discriminate against people who are gay, because, we know unless it is evil organization such as Communism, Nazi, Organize crime or Scientology, under no circumstances, should one discriminate against people of a particular group, due to any form of reason. And the only reason, it is alright to discriminate against Communism, Nazi, Organize Crime or Scientology, is because they are organization dedicated to conduct act of evil and harm, towards others and there is a need for us to defend ourselves, against them, strictly speaking, this ain't discrimination either, it is self defense. (Although, in recent years, people in East Asia tend to become more tolerating to homosexual behavior, mostly because people are showing sympathy towards gay people due to the Catholic church discriminating against them.)
Till date, the only Christian church in the west, which believe racism is a sin, is the United church and that is a very young church, which origin from Korea in the 1960s, created by early Korean Christians and then spread to the west.
They try to put an end to racial, culture and nationality differentiation and hate, via encouraging cross race marriages, cross culture marriages and cross nationality marriages, once a year, they have a major ceremony wedding conducted in Korea, where millions of followers of the United Church, attend the church operated semi arrange marriage program, setting people up into cross race, cross nationality and cross culture couples.(most people who join the program ended up in marriage that include all three characteristic.)
The fact that firstly, within the Catholic church, racism ain't a sin and believing in "King is god's given right" ain't a sin, despite the fact even none Christian can see, these pro racist values and the value of "King is god's given right", is highly problematic, both within and outside the Christian faith and should be a sin. Secondly, not only did the Catholic church, did not make racism a sin, they played a major role in supporting the stolen generation and still haven't confessed to the Christian god for their involvement. Thirdly, saying been gay is a sin, despite, according to their argument, only doing gay marriage should be a sin. Four, during era of Crusaders, the Catholic church actively encourage hate, towards none Christians and hate towards the Orthordox church, which is also of Christian faith, all just prove the point, the role of the Church should be consider as nothing more then a medium, between the Christian faith and its follower and should not be mistaken as the faith itself and the fact is, the church is create by men. Not by the Christian god or the god of any religion in the world and it is not created by Jesus, either.
Amount all Christian churches, I personally, dislike the Catholic church the most, in my opinion, it is one church that have done a lot of bad things, frequently using the name of the Christian god, it was even worse during the early era, where the Christian faith play more of a major role, to rule the way Europeans think and amount them it was even worse, during the earlier era where the church itself have a major influence, on politic.
In addition, a lot of people in the west today, felt the fact that many middle eastern country, use the laws of their dominate religion (Muslim) to rule the state and make it the law of the state, to be problematic. And to be honest, I agree with them. I believe the law of religion and law of the state should remain separate, because, not everybody, is a follower of a particular religion and even if they are, a person should have the right to decide, whether they want to follow the law of a particular religion within their own home state and should not have the religion view, of any religion faith, forced upon them, through the law of state. And in my opinion, the Catholic church once used religion to influence the state and not in a positive manner, for example, one of the biggest problem with pre constitutional monarchy Europe, was the cult of "king is god's given right" and it is suppose to be a sin, within the Christian faith also. But did the Catholic church used their status, to put an end to the none sense and promote equality throughout Europe? No, they didn't. With the cult of King is god's given right gone and believe of equality, been promoted, people dating back to the dark ages, could have revolt and overthrow the bad King and then established a good man, who is an iconic and wise leader, to be King. (Remember the movie Brave Heart? If the none sense of King is god's given right is gone for good, William Wallis could become the next King of Scotland and England, consider he is a much more worthy national leader, then the then King of Scotland and King of England.)
World war two President Chan Kai-shek's great grand son, was been accused of conducting death threat to the former private school in Taipei, that he attend.
Chan Kai-shek's great grand son, the twenty three years old Chan You-ching, claim the accusation is a complete outrage and claim to fight the charges.
Chan You-ching who was a former student of Taipei American private high school, claim during year nine, he was been bullied, during a hockey game, resulting in serious injury to his left leg and back and cause him to need over one year of physical therapy. He felt the school deliberately, ignore him, while he was been bullied. While demanding an answer, the principle of the school expel him, for fighting on school ground. Angry at the school, Chan you-ching continue to desire suing the school, after he got older.
In 2013, Chan You-ching said in a facebook statement that he is so angry at that principle that he fancy bashing him up and if he ever met this principle in a boxing ring, he would KO him till his head explode. In an unrelated statement he talked about some knife he bought. A few weeks later, the school principle sued Chan you-ching for sending death threat to the school, over the statement.
While been interviewed by the press, Chan You-ching still angry over the event, called the charges to be a complete outrage.
"They accuse me for wanting to bomb the school, because I said I got a knife. They accuse me of saying wanting to kill every body in the school, because I said I fancy bashing that principle. They accuse me of wanting to kill the principle, because I say I fancy beating him in a boxing ring." Chan you-ching said.
He also claim, accusing a message he left on his own Facebook page, to express his anger, to be a death threat, send to the school, is a complete outrage.
Chan You-ching, also claim within the last three month, this principle have been sending him threats.
In Taipet city court, the judge decided that, the police would have to conduct further investigation into the statements to help determine whether the statements Chan You-ching made against the principle, are literal threats or just his own expression of anger. If it is literal, then he would be found guilty and send to prison for three years, if not, he would be found not guilty.
Chan You-ching is well known for his outspoken attitude, while facing paparazzi, different from his mother and older brother, who deal with the press, more like politicians.
"I am not my great grand father, Chan Kai-shek I am just an ordinary guy, trying to live his life. I really don't like having my every move been followed around by the paparazzi." Chan you-ching said
Chan You-ching's mother is currently a senior member of Taiwan Nationalist party, his brother Chan You-bo is a businessman and on more then one occasion made it clear to the press that he is just a businessman and have no intention of getting involve with politic.
Professionals said Chan You-ching had something they refer to as three white eye. Three white eye is a nature facial characteristic, that make a person seem extremely hostile, towards others, because of certain unique characteristics, associate with the size and nature positioning of their eyes and unusual ratio between the black eye ball and eye white. People are more likely to feel, as if people with three white eye, are conducting act of hostile towards them or is a person of hostile tendency, even if they do nothing, thus are more likely to be accused of such behavior, by more emotional people.
Within the interview with reporters, Chan you-ching, keep remember to smile, after each sentence, because when he don't smile, his odd eyes make him looked as if he is about to smack a reporter, with a brick.
In court, Chan You-ching, deliberately changed a new hair style and try to keep his eyes only opened half wide, to make his nature appearance seem less hostile, then it really is. And despite continue to claim he didn't do nothing wrong, Chan You-ching, still apologist for all the dramas that his statements has caused.
This is not the first time, Chan You-ching, hostile nature looks got him in trouble. Three years ago, while he and his girl friend worked their own booth, within a market place, he was been accused of operating a drug trafficking booth, by an unnamed informer and got him arrested, in a police raid. He was later released, when the police confirmed, he is only selling ordinary house plants.
A former teacher of Chan You-ching's high school, choose to poke around Chan You-ching's Facebook page, leading to the teacher finding the statement Chan You-ching made about the principle, The teacher then told the principle about the statement, which leads to the principle suing Chan You-ching for sending threats to the school, via Facebook, over these messages.
Within a statement release to the press the brother Chan You-bo said that although Facebook is a personal private space, one should still consider the feeling of others, while speaking.
The manager of the former market place, where Chan You-ching work said that, Chan You-ching is a quiet very shy and gentle person. He usually worked in the background and led his girl friend be the one dealing with customers. After been accused of running a drug trafficking booth three years ago, Chan You-ching seized working in the booth and led his girl friend run the booth, by herself.
People who know Chan You-ching claim, he definitely look extremely hostile when you first met him, but once you get to know him, you realized he is actually a very shy person.
Well, because whenever I think about the Cahtolic church, these are stuff I think about first
1. Their involvement in the Stolen Generation
2. Their involvement in forcing single mother to put their baby up for adoption (most of these children had a life, much worse then they would recieve with their mothers)
3. Their actively role in discriminating against scientific fact that contradict the bible
4. Their lack of respect to other religion
5. Going around accusing people of been witches and killing them
6. Always forcing their religion views on others
7. Jesus say "love your friend and tolerate your enemy", but all I see the Catholic church do, is "love myself and suppress everybody else with my view" if it is a few hundred years ago, they even pull a knife on you, if you refuse to get babptise.
8. Crusade against Muslims, simply because they believe in a different religion
9. For those who don't know, they even launch crusades against the Orthodox church, because it is a "different brench of Christiantiy"
10. Using their religion view to discriminate against homosexual (Although, I am not a big fan of homosexuality, either. The fact is that, the idea of a free country is base on right of freedom, equality and human right and in the same time, respect the freedom and human right of others. The Catholic church have obviously, not learn that.and is still forcing their religion view, to discriminate against people of a particular group, whose alternative life style, cause no harm to society or others [you want to discriminate somebody, why don't you discriminate against bikie gangs instead, they are urban terrorist who like to rape and sale your daughter into the sex trade])
I got nothing against Christiantiy or Jesus. I think Jesus is a great man. But I do not like the Catholic church, one bit and in my opinion, despite the fact they follow after him, the Catholic church does not truly reflect Jesus' spirit.
New Mighty Morphing Power Rangers TV series, hit TV screen in April 2014.
After its initial appearance on TV in the early 90s, Mighty Morphing Power Rangers is to be reinvented and relaunch as a show intend for adults in their 20s and 30s, in April 2014.
The new series follow on from the original MMPR story line, starting with a classified US air force organization known as Silver Guardians. When the Silver Guardians’ commander, General E.A Collins learn an alien been known as Lord Zedd, is returning to conquer earth again, after 20 years, he recruited the aid of Dr. Clark Maxwell, to commence project Ranger, to unlock the secret of the alien technology that defeated Lord Zedd over 20 years ago, known as the Power Rangers. The alien technology include, five super strong armour/battle suit that enhance soldiers existing capability and alien weapons and combat robots, that has fire power and combat capability, unseen by human invention. However, the Power Ranger alien technology proves to be beyond human understanding, even to the brillante Dr. Clark Maxwell. When a female Silver Guardian officer, Claire Ashmore, learn of certain dark secret hidden within the Silver Guardians, she realized the Power Rangers technology can no longer remain in the hand of the US air force and took it upon herself, to steal it, recruit a new team of rangers and search for the aid of Tommy Oliver, the original white ranger and green ranger. In the same time, after been crippled by the original Power Rangers, 20 years ago, Lord Zedd has now restored his powers and preparing to seek his revenge on earth.
Unlike the original MMPR series in the 90s, which was a children show, thus had a simply and colourful storyline, the new MMPR series, is significantly darker, more mature and more dangerous.
It is still unknown whether Jason David Frank, who played Tommy Oliver in the original 90s series, would reappear as Tommy Oliver, in the new series. Considering the original series and the new series was made by two completely different companies and the using of the Tommy Oliver character, require copy right clearance. Power Rangers itself, is a remake of Japanese super hero series, known as Super Santai.
Within the original 90s children series, it tell the story of five teenagers, been summon by a powerful wizard known as Zordon to fight the evil known as Rita and Lord Zedd that want to conquer earth.
The original 90s MMPR children series, was a massive hit, amount boys that grew up in the 90s and loved by some girls also and with those children now in their 20s and 30s, a MMPR remake as an adult show, could prove to be of a profitable but untouched TV market, if done correctly.
The program stars Don Money as Red Ranger Christian Tate, Dina Cataldi as Blue Ranger Clare Ashmore, Martin Pfefferkorn as Dr Clark Maxwell, Jerry Murdock as Lord Zedd, John Damroth as General E.A Collins and David Fielding as Zordon.
Don Money as Christian Tate / Red Ranger
Dina Cataldi as Claire Ashmore / Blue Ranger
Gene Snisky as Goliath
Mack Kuhr as Victor Ryan
David Fielding as Zordon
Martin Pfefferkorn as Dr. Clark Maxwell
Ricky Barksdale as Black Ranger
Kimberly Carvalho as Pink Ranger
Ashley Carvalho as Yellow Ranger
Jerry Murdock as Lord Zedd
John Damroth as General E.A. Collins
Matt Meinsen as Detective Jonathan Stanton